Log inRegister an accountBrowse CSDbHelp & documentationFacts & StatisticsThe forumsAvailable RSS-feeds on CSDbSupport CSDb Commodore 64 Scene Database
You are not logged in - nap
CSDb User Forums


Forums > CSDb Feedback > Separate or merged "cracks" releases.
2009-11-01 23:28
V-12

Registered: Nov 2003
Posts: 206
Separate or merged "cracks" releases.

I'm digging into my old tapes and transfering all datas to 5'25 discs. I'm sharing with all of missed files here but I found one problem. 20 years ago there was alot of "cracks" releases in Poland, which they've been usually just a freezed parts of one game. It was done cause of commercial reasons by some pirates who've been doing tape versions of discs games :)

Now I have question.
Take a look into those releases for example:
Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade (3 parts of the game, every part has linked a cracktro - I've copied all parts into one .d64 image)
Thunderbirds 4
Thunderbirds
2 parts (3, 4 are missed now) - same thing. I've uploaded separately because I don't want to make chaos with missing files. Intros linked for both releases.

My question is:
Should these releases be added as separate releases like:
Indiana Jones III.1
Indiana Jones III.2
Indiana Jones III.3
or not? I really dunno what to do. Any discussion, new rule? In fact they are separate releases but they;ve been made from 1 game...
2009-11-02 00:04
Fungus

Registered: Sep 2002
Posts: 626
They should be deleted and the tapes burned in a bucket with chicken's blood and vodka.
2009-11-02 06:42
chatGPZ

Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 11141
technically each of them should get a seperate entry (because like you said, they are seperate releases).

however, i guess i would prefer to see them in one entry, since they belong together, and also were released together (right?)

mmmh not sure, comments? :)
2009-11-02 06:48
Ksubi
Account closed

Registered: Nov 2007
Posts: 87
I think they should go under "one heading", since they are the same game released by the same group, on the same day, just in different parts. Perhaps you can just "seperate" them by having them on different disks (as you already have).

2009-11-02 07:00
assiduous
Account closed

Registered: Jun 2007
Posts: 343
have them on different disks ? no,definitely not,it makes absolutely no sense. and infact he said the opposite("I've copied all parts into one .d64 image").
2009-11-02 08:00
Ksubi
Account closed

Registered: Nov 2007
Posts: 87
@assiduous: each part IS already on a seperate disk, (Thunderbirds anyway) I was merely stating that. I agree, would be easier on one disk, but for some games not all parts would fit anyway. eg: TWR's brilliant Turrican recrack. (now thats one release that should be "burned in a bucket with chicken's blood and vodka" :-))
2009-11-02 15:41
V-12

Registered: Nov 2003
Posts: 206
Quote: technically each of them should get a seperate entry (because like you said, they are seperate releases).

however, i guess i would prefer to see them in one entry, since they belong together, and also were released together (right?)

mmmh not sure, comments? :)


Maybe this solution (for Indiana Jones/TAF and others) will be the best.

If game got "cracked" (read - freezed) by someone and released as few parts of the game with linked intro to every part, my idea is to add them separately.

But every uploaded file will contain all parts of freezed game. Imho it will be the best solution.

In other case, if there was game freezed into for example 5 parts and only first one has linked cracktro, it should be added to database as 1 entry and .d64 or .t64 file has to contain all parts of this game.

I've found a game called Fields Of Fire, cracked by The Mafia Guys/TMB. This crack = 8 separate parts of the game, numbered in every cracktro, but they doesn't look like freezes. I've uploaded them as 1 release because I dunno if I should add 8 separated entries to csdb?:

http://noname.c64.org/csdb//release/?id=84179
2009-11-02 16:05
chatGPZ

Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 11141
i wouldnt create seperate releases... doesnt make a lot of sense imho.
2009-11-02 21:25
AlexC

Registered: Jan 2008
Posts: 293
First of all I think that CSDB is not a database of everything ever released - now please correct me if I'm wrong. Not every crack can be and is brilliant but I don't think ActionReplay frozen games are releases really worth preserving (unless we want to preserve "cracktros" linked to them). In case of intros there is already another effort going on trying to rip and preserver every single one so there is a good place for them already too and it's not CSDB.

Just my 2 cents...
2009-11-02 23:10
Count Zero

Registered: Jan 2003
Posts: 1825
Quote: They should be deleted and the tapes burned in a bucket with chicken's blood and vodka.


I fully agree with Fungus and AlexC here.
Though I would treat the victim transfer disks to harm no danger anymore I as well strongly discourage you from uploading frozen "cracks" at all. Even with the intromaker production slapped infront it sure just wastes the time of some people and will disgrace the polish "scene".


l8r

Count Zero/CyberpunX/SCS*TRC
2009-11-02 23:47
V-12

Registered: Nov 2003
Posts: 206
Quote: First of all I think that CSDB is not a database of everything ever released - now please correct me if I'm wrong. Not every crack can be and is brilliant but I don't think ActionReplay frozen games are releases really worth preserving (unless we want to preserve "cracktros" linked to them). In case of intros there is already another effort going on trying to rip and preserver every single one so there is a good place for them already too and it's not CSDB.

Just my 2 cents...


CSDB is in fact a database: a place, where you can find (almost?) all informations about scene, sceners, releases. And this is our goal to create this history here. Correct me if I'm wrong :)

I dislike the idea of ripping intros. Intros ripped from games aren't releases but only rips. It all goes to rip everything: music, scrolltext, intros. Now lemme wait for graphics ripping and code, fonts and all added separately to every release on csdb... I prefer to have full releases, even if this is lame freeze game with added cracktro (even done on demomaker). This *IS* a release.

I agree, that freezed games are lame, but it was 20 years ago and in fact this is a part of Polish lamer sceners history and we can't deny it.

And my goal is not to discuss about lame freezed games, but just to save and keep the history and also discover her.
 
... 6 posts hidden. Click here to view all posts....
 
Previous - 1 | 2 - Next
RefreshSubscribe to this thread:

You need to be logged in to post in the forum.

Search the forum:
Search   for   in  
All times are CET.
Search CSDb
Advanced
Users Online
pcollins/Quantum
anonym/padua
mutetus/Ald ^ Ons
Derision/Longshot
mnaberez
Exploding Fi../Techn..
Guests online: 121
Top Demos
1 Next Level  (9.8)
2 Mojo  (9.7)
3 Coma Light 13  (9.7)
4 Edge of Disgrace  (9.6)
5 13:37  (9.6)
6 Comaland 100%  (9.6)
7 Uncensored  (9.6)
8 No Bounds  (9.6)
9 Wonderland XIV  (9.6)
10 Bromance  (9.5)
Top onefile Demos
1 Layers  (9.6)
2 It's More Fun to Com..  (9.6)
3 Party Elk 2  (9.6)
4 Cubic Dream  (9.6)
5 Copper Booze  (9.6)
6 TRSAC, Gabber & Pebe..  (9.5)
7 Rainbow Connection  (9.5)
8 Dawnfall V1.1  (9.5)
9 Quadrants  (9.5)
10 Daah, Those Acid Pil..  (9.5)
Top Groups
1 Oxyron  (9.3)
2 Nostalgia  (9.3)
3 Booze Design  (9.3)
4 Censor Design  (9.3)
5 Crest  (9.3)
Top Organizers
1 Burglar  (9.9)
2 Sixx  (9.8)
3 hedning  (9.7)
4 Irata  (9.7)
5 MWS  (9.6)

Home - Disclaimer
Copyright © No Name 2001-2024
Page generated in: 0.049 sec.