| |
ptoing
Registered: Sep 2005
Posts: 271 |
VIC20, +4, C16 and so on
I think it would be nice to have all Commodore 8 bit machines on the CSDb, it might even generate more demos and stuff for the less common systems. |
|
... 188 posts hidden. Click here to view all posts....
|
| |
Oswald
Registered: Apr 2002
Posts: 5017 |
TDJ, what is your alternative, Im eager to learn it. To let pc and amiga demos also in ? or to not make any changes and sticking to c64 only ?
the solution is clearly what jailbird and probably others alread proposed:
when tdj or jailbird is browsing:
SELECT ...... FROM csdb WHERE ..... AND platform="c64" |
| |
Mace
Registered: May 2002
Posts: 1799 |
Okay, I read the thread and counted votes.
Some of you weren't exactly clear on all points, but I did my best to categorise anyway.
The list again:
1) C64 only, not other machine
2) C64, C128, DTV, all able to produce the blue boot screen.
3) C64, C128, DTV, VIC-20
4) C64, C128, DTV, Plus/4, C16, VIC-20 (the 8 bitters, with DTV as a sidestep)
5) The above + Amiga (all post-PET Commodore computers)
6) The above + PC (endless...)
1 2 3 4 5 6
CBA - * - - - -
Doc - * - - - -
Drake - - * * - -
Graham - - * - - -
Jailbird - * - * - -
Knoeki - - - * - -
Mace - * * * - -
MagerValp - - * - - -
Oswald - - - * - -
Ptoing - - - * - -
RadiantX - - * - - -
Ready - * - - - -
Scout * - - - - -
TDJ * - - - - *
TMR - - * * - -
YokoTV - - - * - -
Luca (not clear)
Moloch (not clear)
From the 16 people who had a clear 'vote', these are the results:
1) 2
2) 5
3) 6
4) 8
5) 0
6) 1
This means that half of the people in this thread would like to see the 264-platform on CSDb too.
But beware: the conclusion should NOT be that therefor this platform should be added.
This wasn't a clear poll, because we only voted in favour of something and not against the other options. So someone who voted in favour of option 4 doesn't necessarily have to be against the other options.
So in this case we shouldn't go for the highest number of votes, untill everybody clearly voted in favour AND against all respective options.
Apart from that, the ones who voted are just a very small part of the people on CSDb. This means this is far from democratic.
The only conclusion I dare to draw is that adding more than just C64 is not something a lot of people object against. |
| |
Hein
Registered: Apr 2004
Posts: 933 |
I'm in favour of no. 4 category as well. I'd also like to see about demos/cwacks released on other Commodore 8 bit machines (PET etc). These releases don't get as much attention as C64 releases and can be inspiring to some. |
| |
Tao
Registered: Aug 2002
Posts: 115 |
I'm in favour of option 4 and dead set against options 5 + 6. |
| |
ptoing
Registered: Sep 2005
Posts: 271 |
I favor 4,3,2 in that order. |
| |
enthusi
Registered: May 2004
Posts: 675 |
my ranks:
3
2,4
1
|
| |
cadaver
Registered: Feb 2002
Posts: 1153 |
Ah well, could tell my opinion too instead of inserting just random sarcastic remark: since there's already C128, DTV, SuperCPU etc. stuff here anyway, and going more puritan at this point doesn't seem worth enforcing, I'd be in favor of 4) too |
| |
drake
Account closed
Registered: Dec 2002
Posts: 207 |
no. 4 seems a good one IMO.
|
| |
Graham
Account closed
Registered: Dec 2002
Posts: 990 |
@Mace: You can put me to 4. I am not opposed to +4 on CDDb although I think it's links to C64 are weaker than those of the VIC20. |
| |
Mace
Registered: May 2002
Posts: 1799 |
(Hopefully you all understand that I'm merely collecting votes here. I am not at all part of the "1337" behind CSDb ;-) ) |
| Previous - 1 | ... | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | ... | 20 - Next |
